Load Original Page



Hello! Guest
login Join







About us   Privacy-policy   contact-us  
SoloTutes Blog

Login   |    Join


Follow us on



©2020 SoloTutes




How Did The Governor-Generals Contributed In British Conquest And All About The Setting Up Of New Administration.

Warren Hastings (Governor-General 1773 to 1785) played a significant role in the expansion of Company power.By his time the Company had acquired power not only in Bengal but also in Bombay and Madras and these were considered as administrative units called Presidencies.

Pooja Agnihotri
updated: 23 May 2022

SETTING UP A NEW ADMINISTRATION :
Warren Hastings (Governor-General 1773 to 1785) played a significant role in the expansion of Company power.
By his time the Company had acquired power not only in Bengal but also in Bombay and Madras and these were considered as administrative units called Presidencies.
Each was ruled by a Governor. The supreme head of the administration was the Governor-General.
Warren Hastings, the first Governor-General, introduced several administrative reforms, notably in the sphere of justice.
Under the Regulating Act of 1773, a new Supreme Court was established, while a court of appeal – the Sadar Nizamat Adalat – was also set up at Calcutta.
The principal figure in an Indian district was the Collector whose main job was to collect revenue and taxes and maintain law and order in his district with the help of judges, police officers etc.
ROLE OF GOVERNOR GENERALS IN THE BRITISH CONQUESTS :
We shall try to understand what happened after Plassey and Buxar. The two battles made the Brits unquestioned champions of the land, but they still had obstacles to pass. These were the small states throughout the territory of India. The way some of the governors-general handled the situation and finally made the British the sole power in India is worth understanding.

Robert Clive
We begin with Robert Clive (1765-72) who was given a second chance following his outstanding military leadership. He introduced a system known as ‘dual administration’ in Bengal. The company already had the power to collect its own taxes. Thus it was the diwan. Now, with the say in the appointment of the deputy subahdar, the company got the de-facto ownership of the nizamat too. Thus, in effect, the company had power without responsibility.It was also during Clive’s time that the taxation in Bengal became so favourable to the British that they stopped bringing money from England to buy Indian goods. Instead, they invested the revenue they received from Bengal in buying Indian goods itself. Then they sold it in foreign countries. These were called the ‘investments’ of the company in India.
WARREN HASTINGS :
The next was Warren Hastings (1772-85), who had ‘war’ in his name itself. The interference in others’ territories continued. Initially, he fought Mysore with the help of the Nizam, and later intervened in the internal politics of the Marathas, by siding with Raghunath Rao, against the infant Peshwa Madhav Rao 2, who was represented by Nana Phadnis. This long Anglo-Maratha war lasted from 1775 to 1782. It was at this time that he had to face the combined forces of the Marathas, the Nizam, and Mysore. But through tactics and turning one ruler against another, he fought his way through. In the first Anglo-Maratha war, the British couldn’t do much. In the end, the treaty of Salbai was signed which maintained the status quo and gave them ample time to recover. This enabled them to fight with Hyder, in which they were helped by the Marathas.
War with Haider Ali started in 1780. Though Haider won initially, Hastings’ cunning tactics helped the British in choking out deals with Nizam and the Marathas through the cessation of territories. In 1781, Haider Ali was defeated by Eyre Coot and later died in 1782. His son Tipu carried on the fight from 1789 but was defeated in 1792. Half of his treaties were ceded by the treaty of Seringapatanam.
WELLESLEY :
Wellesley (1798-1805) was the next important Governor-General. By 1797, Mysore and Marathas were weakened in power. He knew it was the ripe time for rapid expansion. He followed the policy of ‘Subsidiary alliances’, outright wars, and assumption of territories of previously subordinated rulers. You know what the theory of a subsidiary alliance is. It was described as “a system of fattening allies as we fatten oxen, till they were worthy of being devoured”. The first was the Nizam in 1798 and 1800. Then came the Nawab of Awadh in 1801.All this time, Tipu was strengthening himself. He had also asked for French help.

But in 1799, before the French help could reach him, he fought a fierce war and died.
At this time, the Marathas were a confederacy of five factions namely the Peshwa (Poona), Gaekwad (Baroda), Sindhia (Gwalior), Holkar (Indore), and Bhonsle (Nagpur). Though Peshwa was the nominal head, these factions were constantly at war. When Peshwa Baji Rao 2 was defeated by Holkar, he took the treaty of Subsidiary alliance. Even then, it would have been really difficult for the British to defeat them, only if they stood together. But even in the face of imminent danger, they didn’t unite. Thus, one or more factions stood and watched when another one fought the British and were defeated one by one.However, the expansionist policy of Wellesley was proving too costly to the government. Hence, he was recalled from India.
HASTINGS :
The next Governor-General was Hastings (1813-1823). The Marathas decided to push one last time. They united to form a small group, but by now, it was too late. They were easily defeated. The Peshwas territories were annexed to the Bombay presidency. To satisfy them, a small kingdom of Satara was given to Shivaji’s descendant who ruled it under the British.
Thus, by 1818, the entire subcontinent, except Punjab and Sind was under the British. They completed this task by 1857. The growing Anglo-Russian rivalry in Europe and Asia caused the fear of a Russian attack from the North-West. Sind was a friendly state to the British. Still, in 1843, Charles Napier conquered it. He later wrote, “We have no right to seize Sind, yet we shall do so, and a very advantageous, useful humane piece of rascality it will be”.
DALHOUSIE :
Dalhousie (1848-1856) was the next Governor-General. He introduced the Doctrine of lapse, by which he annexed many small states like Satara in 1848, Nagpur and Jhansi in 1854, etc. This was a major cause of the Great revolt of 1857. He also wanted to conquer Awadh, but his doctrine wouldn’t work there because the Nawab had many heirs. Thus, he accused him of having misgoverned the state, and annexed it on that pretext, in 1856.



Links in this Post

responsibility.It

1801.All

SIMILAR FOR YOU

Videos from Youtube 〉

How did Britain Conquer India? | Animated History
Check out Squarespace for a free trial at https://www.squarespace.com/armchairhistorian and use the code 'ARMCHAIR' for 10% ...
MindMaps for UPSC - History
ModernIndianHistory #GovernorGeneral
Crash Course Modern History | British East India Company from 1600 - 1857
This is a crash course lecture on Modern History for UPSC Civil Service Prelims and Mains/IAS/SSC CGL/CDSE/NDA exam point ...
L10: British Administrative Policies | Modern History | UPSC CSE | Vishal Chauhan
Vishal Chauhan's Profile Link - https://unacademy.onelink.me/081J/fbb549b0 UPSC CSE- GS Subscription Page: ...
History for UPSC, Regulating Act 1773, Pits India Act 1784, Charter Act 1813 and 1833
Click here https://bit.ly/2wJs0SV to Download our Android APP to have access to 1000's of #Smart_Courses covering length and ...
The Doctrine of Lapse | From Trade to Territory | Class 8 History
Watch Full Free Course:- https://www.magnetbrains.com​​​​​​ ✔️ Get Notes Here: ...
a quick overview on Nobel Prizes How did British rule affect the Indian Villages and what are the changes introduced by them in India ?